Zero Day MonitorZDM
DashboardVulnerabilitiesTrendingZero-DaysNewsAbout
Login
ImpressumPrivacy Policy
Zero Day Monitor © 2026
2821 articles · 109423 vulns · 38/41 feeds (7d)
← Back to list
7.5
CVE-2026-2673

Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword.

Description

Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.

Also Affects

Downstream vendors/products affected by this vulnerability

VendorProductSourceConfidence
debiandebian linuxcert_advisory90%
open sourceopensslcert_advisory90%

References

  • https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2157c9d81f7b0bd7dfa25b960e928ec28e8dd63f
  • https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/85977e013f32ceb96aa034c0e741adddc1a05e34
  • https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260313.txt
  • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/03/13/3

Related News (2 articles)

Tier A
Microsoft MSRC3h ago
CVE-2026-2673 OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may choose unexpected key agreement group
→ No new info (linked only)
Tier B
BSI Advisories1d ago
[UPDATE] [niedrig] OpenSSL: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Umgehen von Sicherheitsvorkehrungen
→ No new info (linked only)
CVSS 3.17.5 HIGH
VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CISA KEV❌ No
Actively exploited❌ No
CWECWE-757
PublishedMar 13, 2026
Last enriched7d ago
Trending Score38
Source articles2
Independent2
Info Completeness5/14
Missing: vendor, product, versions, epss, kev, exploit, patch, iocs, mitre_attack

Community Vote

0
Login to vote
0 upvotes0 downvotes
No votes yet

Pin to Dashboard

Verification

State: verified
Confidence: 100%

Vulnerability Timeline

CVE Published
Mar 13, 2026
Discovered by ZDM
Apr 1, 2026